Xinyu Gao vs Chloe Paquet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Sep at 08:42 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
X. Gao vs C. Paquet

CHN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gao 2 - 0 Paquet
They have played 5 sets in total, with Xinyu Gao winning 4 and Chloe Paquet winning 1. The last match between Xinyu Gao and Chloe Paquet was at the WTA Changsha Open - Changsha, 03-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Xinyu Gao getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Gao | 2 |
Paquet | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) WTA Changsha Open - Changsha(09-03-25)
(R1) W40 Funchal(11-14-23)
X. Gao vs C. Paquet H2H Profile
X. Gao vs C. Paquet Match Preview:
- Gao's recent second serve win rate is slightly weaker at 38.94%, compared to Paquet’s 41.26%. Could this reflect on their match outcome?
- Examining return games, Paquet has a comparative edge, winning 54.29% of their opponent's second serve points, superior to Gao’s 50.58%.
- On first serve returns, Gao has a slight advantage at 37.08%, slightly eclipsing Paquet’s 35.96%.
- Under pressure, Gao saves 46.27% of breakpoints; however, Paquet excels here saving 49.71%.
- In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Gao has a higher win percentage at 57.41% versus Paquet’s 37.5%.
- Both players perform best on clay; Gao has a win rate of 68% on this surface, while Paquet’s stands at 53%.
- Notably, Gao's grass performance is non-existent at 0%, while Paquet has managed a 35% win rate on grass.
- At Challengers/ITF events, Gao boasts a stronger record, winning 61.76%, marginally outdoing Paquet’s 50%.
- Direct head-to-head history tilts in Gao's favor with one win against Paquet in previous encounters.
- In a deciding set scenario, Gao significantly outperforms Paquet, winning 63% of these sets compared to Paquet's 30% success rate.
- Gao has a marginally better breakpoint conversion rate at 43.23% over Paquet's 39.86%.
Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their second serve statistics, Paquet shows a minor advantage, yet Gao's ability to convert breakpoints more effectively could be decisive.
Paquet exhibits stronger second serve return stats, but Gao’s higher efficiency in handling first serves and breakpoints suggests strategic superiority.
Head-to-head data strongly favors Gao, who has consistently outperformed Paquet in recent matchups.
While Paquet handles breakpoints slightly better, Gao's overall superior win record and performance in deciding sets make them a formidable opponent.
Given these comprehensive statistics and the historical advantage, Gao is positioned as the likely winner for the upcoming match.
Xinyu Gao vs Chloe Paquet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
X. Gao vs C. Paquet H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 1 |
28 | Games Won | 17 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 18 |
2:20:4 | Average Match Time | 2:20:4 |
66% (95/145) | 1st Serve % | 52% (89/170) |
74% (70/95) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (52/89) |
40% (20/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (35/81) |
39% (11/28) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (6/16) |
49% (83/170) | Return Points Win % | 38% (55/145) |
100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
X. Gao Recent Matches Played
C. Paquet Recent Matches Played

X. Gao vs C. Paquet Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61.56% (269/168) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.53% (427/418) |
59.15% (595/411) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.35% (1008/955) |
53.54% (4846/4206) | Games Win/Loss | 50.96% (9206/8858) |
61.38% (213/134) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.55% (97/107) |
68.33% (41/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.63% (250/225) |
53.57% (15/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.66% (74/75) |
0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.29% (6/11) |
0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
604 | Aces Total | 2039 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
952 | Total Double Faults | 2924 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:11 |
483.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.02 |
64% (14358/22527) | 1st Serve % | 59% (25102/42322) |
60% (8608/14358) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (16069/25102) |
46% (3763/8169) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7617/17220) |
48% (1427/2963) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2277/5035) |
47% (10456/22249) | Return Points Win % | 44% (19036/42942) |
22.22% (2/7) | Slam W/L | 29.27% (12/29) |
16.67% (1/5) | Masters W/L | 15.38% (2/11) |
44.44% (12/15) | Main Tour W/L | 40.95% (43/62) |
62.65% (208/124) | Challenger W/L | 53.19% (275/242) |
73.02% (46/17) | Futures W/L | 56.21% (95/74) |
62% (263/425) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (422/833) |
50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
57% (44/77) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (90/182) |
57% (77/136) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (119/273) |
87% (267/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (453/364) |
12% (267/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (453/88) |
21% (170/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (392/61) |